For the purposes of our first assignment, I attended a local
meeting of Alcoholics Anonymous. I was optimistic about the project initially,
but as the time approached to actually go to the meeting, I could feel myself
getting nervous. I talked briefly over the phone with the facilitator of this
group prior to my arrival, to make sure I wouldn't be making anyone
uncomfortable with my unexplained presence there. Clearly, I had a lot to
learn. He just kind of laughed at my nervousness and told me it was no problem
at all.
I have no point of references for these meetings, and I was
determined not to let my consumption of popular culture's depiction of AA
meetings seep in. Still, I was a bit surprised by the large size of the group. By
the time everyone straggled in, there were 16 of us there, with an Al-Anon
meeting going on just down the hall. One of the men, who must have been in at
least his seventies, told us that his wife was in the other meeting, and that
it was something they "could do together." I had made up my mind
before arriving that I wasn't going to say anything, but simply observe -
hopefully without staring or betraying any expressions that might appear to be
judgmental. Later, I'll come back to how that decision worked out for me.
The facilitator opened
the meeting with the serenity prayer, followed by a reading of the twelve
traditions. At this point, everything felt very rigid and formal, and I
perceived a bit of distance in the room. In fact, only one person had
introduced himself prior to the meeting; everyone else either gave a slight nod
or ignored me completely. I was preparing myself for a letdown, that this might
be no more than some chanting and empty "admissions."
However, at this point, the facilitator turned the meeting
over to (name withheld), who had been tasked with selecting a discussion topic for the evening.
His topic was the issue of the past: how we deal with it, how it continues to
impact us, and its importance or relevance in our current actions. And after
the topic was laid before the group, people began to speak up. At that
point, my impression of the evening shifted dramatically.
One man started by saying that he felt his past was
incredibly important for him in remaining sober, sort of a cautionary tale at
all times. Others focused more on living in the moment, and you could tell that
for them, the past was something they had not been terribly willing to address.
One woman even said as much, thanking (name withheld) for the topic and saying that she
hadn't thought anyone else struggled with the idea of dealing with their past.
She had actually brought her teenage daughter to the meeting, and spoke of how
she had wasted the first four years of her daughter's life. Due to the topic
being discussed, the step most mentioned was number nine - making amends with
people that we have harmed.
I'd like to talk about how the group reacted to these
stories, and compare it to my own reaction. I can say that I was unprepared for
any kind of emotional connection or response to the meeting, mostly because I
was unprepared for what one of these meetings would actually be like. By the
time the third person was sharing, I could feel myself fighting tears. Now
anyone who knows me will tell you that I am a crier; I'm not embarrassed or
ashamed of it. But in this context, I was so
consumed with being an observer rather than a participant, and with not
distracting anyone who was there and perhaps struggling, that it became an internal
battle to master the swell of visible emotion. This was necessary because what I saw was frankly
beautiful. I wasn't having a reaction to the stories; I've heard enough stories
of addiction, divorce and abuse in my time to be unsurprised by it, and even
less surprised given the context in which I found myself. Instead, I was
reacting to the atmosphere created by the participants in the room.
Everyone was listening...really
listening. Some people were more active listeners, more willing to make eye
contact or nod along, but it was clear just from simple observation that they
were all hearing and relating to the other stories. And I know this will sound
so astoundingly obvious, but I was struck by these people's empathy via shared experience. Of course
they listened with a more sympathetic ear; they had all been there themselves!
And I also noticed that no one in the room was trying to "fix" anyone
else. I think it is a byproduct of the 12-step process that these folks
all realize they are on their own timetables, and moving through the steps at a
different pace. There were a few affirmations ("I'm glad you're here"
was the most common phrase to hear after someone shared) and even some
differences of opinion or experience, but it never once became a
disagreement. Again - it was a beautiful
thing to be a part of.
The tone and air of the meeting was
pretty light. The topic was obviously serious, and you could hear regret woven
into most of what was shared. With the subject matter being "the
past," that seemed only natural. People were reflecting on relationships
lost - it was so saddening to hear story after story of destroyed marriages and
the neglect of parental responsibilities - and on time wasted. But there was
also hope in many of the stories. Those that were truly embracing the program
were clearly seeing its benefits; one person referred to her low points as
being the result of "a bad program" - meaning that she had overlooked
or moved too quickly through certain steps.
At this point, I'd like to return to the topic of my role
and behavior during the meeting. The
facilitator hadn't given me any instructions other than a request to keep
everything anonymous. But he also didn't say anything to the group about who I
was. Given that this was an open meeting, I don't think anyone questioned why I
was there. And since I didn't share anything during the meeting, I am quite
certain that they all assumed I was sharing in their struggles with alcohol and
addiction. One of the women even took my
hand on her way out, told me she was glad I had come, and gave me the phrase I
have been led to believe is common in 12-step groups: "Keep coming
back." A few of the members even invited me to grab dinner with them
afterward. I have to be honest: I felt miserable at that moment, like I was
lying to these people who had let me into their group. But I left without
revealing to them why I was there. I'm still not sure if that was right or
wrong.
When I got back to my car, I let the emotions go. I just
sobbed for a minute or two. Honestly, there was some pity and sadness in those
tears. I'd heard heart-rending tales of loss, failure and back-sliding in just
a short hour. But they were also the tears that cleanse. I had seen a group of
individuals, bound by a common shortcoming, gather together to strengthen, comfort
and exhort one another. I had seen them ultimately welcome me in, a stranger,
and not pester me about personal information, commitment, or "where I
stood" with my addiction. Instead, they allowed me to see behind the
curtain of their struggles, and all they asked in return was that I honor the
privacy of those struggles.
And then the "takeaway" hit me like a ton of
bricks. In fact, I'd been slowly realizing it all evening. It's the thing I
could write about for pages and pages, once the connection was made in my mind.
It was simply this: that this is how the church should be toward the broken. We are all addicted
to our sinfulness, and this addiction has cost us relationships, joy and a
connectedness to our Creator. What we as a body of believers should offer to
one another - and to all who enter our doors - is the same openness and
understanding that I witnessed at this meeting. That anyone we encounter should
ultimately feel safe, within a church context, to stand up in front of others
and say "Hi, I'm David, and I'm a sinner." Then we can truly see
Christ's healing and redemptive powers at work.
As the group was breaking up for the evening, I hung back
for one final word with the facilitator. I thanked him for letting me be a part
of the group, and asked if it might be okay if I came again sometime. He simply
smiled, as he had before, and said, "it's an open meeting." It was a
fitting end to an eye-opening, exhilarating evening, and the perfect last
phrase in my analogy. May our churches be "open meetings" where those
who are weary from sin, unable to conquer it on their own, can come seeking
rest and peace and comfort.
And yes - I will be going back.
It's ironic that the church, the one place in the world with both answers on how to truly deal with and overcome hurt, loss, pain, and sin; and the understanding that all of us are broken and hurting, is the place where we often feel least able to open up and be honest and feel we must pretend to have never experienced it.
ReplyDeleteJason, you're so correct. It has become a place of judgment and condemnation - or at least that's often the perception. Great point - and a great area for improvement.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, David. I left my meeting with a similar revelation. I felt like I had new eyes to see myself and my inability to gain control over my weaknesses and sin....and the church and how we treat teh weary and broken.
ReplyDeleteAmen, bother.
Thanks, Candace! I'm glad the experience was eye-opening for you as well. I wish we'd had more time in class to discuss it all.
ReplyDelete